|
|
2005-04-24 00:23
难道是我眼花???
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright. If a copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated (though this does happen occasionally). However, some free software licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger range of possible restrictions. That means there are many possible ways such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and non-free.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.cn.html
大部份的自由软件的许可证是基於 copyleft ,而可以加诸於其上的要求类型是有限制的。如果一份基於版权的许可证遵守了如上所述的自由时,那么就不太可能会遇上我们从未预期过的其它类型的问题(虽然偶尔还是会有)。不过,有一些自由软件的许可证是基於合同的条款,而合同可以被加诸较大程度的可能限制。这表示像是这样的许可证,会有许多可能的方式变得受限到无法接受,因而成为「非自由」的。 |
|