fedora 有哪些优点？我们为什么使用 fedora？

tendertang

别争了
我就是用fc作程序而已
不想在系统上花太多的东西
反正我不是来开发系统的
而是运行于系统上的软件而已

anders8848

bbbush版主怎么近来这么喜欢顶陈年贴？汗一下，都三年啦！

bbbush

Post by anders8848
bbbush版主怎么近来这么喜欢顶陈年贴？汗一下，都三年啦！

不是的，是把好多帖子合并到了一起
再者，我自己也很难回答这些问题，所以去故纸堆里找找答案
尽管我很喜欢 fedora，却找不到理由让所有人都去用 rawhide 仓库

bbbush

fedora 在软件包管理方面，比起 debian 和 Ubuntu 的好处在于可以有多种选择，并且 yum 比起 apt 也有很多优点

I'm sorry but...
By Mike (IP: ---.dyn.iinet.net.au) - Posted on 2005-04-27 04:17:52
Call me a zealot or whatever, but what advantages does Fedora Core have over something like Ubuntu or other debian/other distro's with sane package management? None as far as I can see.  


reply to Mike (IP: ---.dyn.iinet.net.au)
By Finalzone (IP: ---.bchsia.telus.net) - Posted on 2005-04-27 05:22:47
About yum as package management:

- yum can make difference between 32 bit and 64 bits. It is bi-arch. Apt-get does not support that feature yet.
- use of metadata which means each repository is made on a single file (useful to list mirror server)

Fedora Core can use other package managers such as apt-get and smartpm. Therefore, it is more about choice although I personnaly choose yum as it is the default.



@Mike
By Mathman (IP: ---.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net) - Posted on 2005-04-27 05:26:58
First off, apt runs on Fedora if you so desire. So how is that any different than Debian or whatever you want me to call you a zealot about? Secondly, if you're going to sit there and tell that without a frontend package manager that rpm packages are really any different deb files, well, I hate to break it to you but you're pretty ignorant when it comes to all things Linux.


@ idris33  
By Blia (IP: ---.dial.proxad.net) - Posted on 2005-04-27 16:46:30
Ok, once for all, I will try to teach some Debian users how packages are managed in both (debian and fedora) distros.
Actually, some people criticize RPM packages because of their supposed dependancy problems.


CASE 1 : install a package on a system not connected to internet
- under debian : dpkg -i package.dep
- under fedora : rpm -ivh package.rpm

And under BOTH these distros, if there missing librairies, a message will be displayed. So stop pretending RPMs suck because of their dependancy problems, since DEBs have the same!


CASE 2 : install a package on a system connected to internet
- under debian : apt-get install package
- under fedora : yum install package

Both have a package manager that handles dependancy problems, installing or removing a package is 99.99% EXACTLY the same.
So please, please, stop criticizing RPMs because of a supposed problem with dependancies, DEB has the same.



By the way, I suggest everyone (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandrake users) to try Smartpm. It's a new package manager (made by the developper of APT-RPM and Synaptic) that handles packages better than apt or yum. Just have a look at the README page of this website : http://smartpm.org

For Fedora users, to install Smartpm, follow the instructions at http://fedoranews.org/blog/?p=573


And to know the differencies between versions of Fedora : http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora





apt vs yum
By ssam (IP: ---.access.as9105.com) - Posted on 2005-04-27 17:24:29
so will it be easy to upgrade from fc3 to fc4?

in ubuntu upgrading from one version to the next is basically a case of replacing "warty" with "hoary" in /etc/apt/sources.list or in the synaptic prefs, and clicking reload, mark upgrades and apply.

also can yum continue a partial download yet? ie for people on dialup with connection time limits.

pingliu

Post by yisha
如果你习惯了用紫光，请你试试xsim，所谓不怕不识货，就怕货比货，对比一下，你就会明白兄弟们辛辛苦苦把minichinput卸载调，冒着系统出现问题的危险把拼音输入法换成xsim有没有道理。其实装上一个xsim输入法并不难，而且可以学到不少东西，“把时间白白的浪费在桌面上”？设置桌面和系统的一些基本的东西是学习linux的基本功呢，这些东西搞不好，请问兄弟你是如何搞内核的麻烦传授一下？我本人比较菜，我当然要从最基本的系统设置学起，redhat 8.0的汉化，美化，输入法安装等并不难，这些基本的系统设置尚且无法搞定，那请问兄弟你编译出了什么样的内核哪？

我弱弱的问一下，我看你们都说xsim好，有没有试过fctix啊，这两个哪个好啊？？

苦涩之恋

哎，linux差就差在这里，版本比较多，让人眼花瞭乱，不知道用哪个好，不过这次我想我就铁定了心用FC4了，我还没买。

苦涩之恋

Post by 唯雪
我是一个linux的新手,看了坛子上关于汉化的贴子,不由得想要试一试,结果付出了惨痛的代价---重装了N此

1.自带的输入法我觉得智能拼音很好用,看了很多人用xsim,就跟你人家瞎该,结果什么输入法都没了,安装什么输入法都无济于事--包括miniChinput,不得不重装了第一次.

2.看了人家用simsun,字体满好看,忍不住又是改了一通,结果不成功,把备份复原了,呵喝,连Xwindow都进步去了.

其实,linux带的其实也满不错的,把Molliza的最小字体改为12or14,看网页其实一点都不累,何必自寻烦恼来.
还有,汉化的贴子都是改这改那,也不说为什么,就是一通瞎改,不管合适不合适.唉,这里我还是建议高手把根据些清楚一下,不要让我们这些鸟们一头雾水才好.

还有关于安装主题,不同的主题有不同的安装方法,安了主题,linux比原来PL多了.(看附件)

还有我的观点就是--能用就行,好用最好.毕竟linux不如windows的界面漂亮.当然这有待改进.
不要把有限的时间花费到这些56的事情上,linux还有很多地方等待我们去探索.!!!:cool:

哎，我想自己机子上的系统够自己用就行了。何必自寻烦恼呢？///

bbbush

StrangerCHL 兄弟说
http://www.linuxsir.cn/bbs/showthread.php?t=231249

RHEL和Fedora目的不同，前者是面向服务器应用的，内核和软件包更新比较慢，求一稳定尔。Fedora则面向桌面应用，且维护都交给社区了，多采用当时最新技术，就是一时尚...安装要求都差不多。

觉得心有戚戚焉

今天给一个孩子推荐 fedora，因为要做操作系统实验。想想其他发行版，真的没什么好推荐的，班图和Mandriva,SuSE 这几个首先就排除了，而 debian。。。。谁知道呢，感觉怪怪的。然后，总不能给新手推荐 gentoo, slackware, LFS 吧，时间有限而宝贵，不如多做一会儿实验，集中注意力写程序，折腾啥呢。结果还是转回到 fedora 了。要是推荐 rhel/centos 其实是一样的，因为做点实验而已，懂得怎么写设备驱动比起怎么安装、怎么更新软件包这些都重要。fedora 的安装使用太简单了。


-

xiaoxindown

强，这么久的帖子又跑上来了，也来扯几句,正巧我正考虑是否要加个系统(犹豫中，个人原因，不喜欢搞多系统)。
如果是作为个人桌面使用的话，我不会选择redhat/fedora系列,个人不喜欢gui配置，不欣赏他擅自改动命令，版本号等。比较喜欢slackware的简洁和忠于原版。freebsd的严谨，优雅。
但是为了生活，我需要做开发，偏偏那么多商业软件，特别是数据库默认支持redhat,suse.想在其他版本上安装基本都需要进行改动。来来回回的改，搞的我有点精疲力尽了。
无疑，从目前现状来看，想舒舒服服的在linux上搞开发，redhat系列和suse是首选。
鱼与熊掌不能兼得~唉！

kys_9138

本人全力支持FC4
因为它所支持的硬件很多
减轻新手一些不必要的痛苦
用更多的时间来深入学习

俺的时间不多了，想死了。
呵呵！！！