WHY KDE RULES

jhuangjiahua

Post by bbbush
想起刚开始学 linux 的时候，就是在各种定制中高兴得不得了，emacs 和 KDE，没事就去看有哪些配置可以设置，可以玩，然后给别人炫耀 linux 多么了不起，可定制程度多么高。可是玩累了之后，还是老老实实的用 vim & gnome-terminal & eclipse 写作业，顺手而不伤眼睛，或者说机缘巧合。我想大多数人不会玩到累，那么就 KDE 好了。

现在想想，如果不写程序，那么无论这些软件提供了多少可能性，都和自己没关系

觉得 windows 里面的 COM 蛮了不起的，调用来调用去的。对 linux 程序一窍不通
linux 下有没有好用的应用程序框架，就是那种非常完整非常完整的界面程序？

对应于 Windows 的 com 和 com+
KDE 有更加优秀的 kparts/dcop ，正在用 d-bus 代替 dcop
Gnome 现在用着 Bonobo/Mico ， 不过以后会向 kparts 靠拢，即 GParts/d-bus


建议 bbbush MM 去看看 jserv 的这篇 http://blog.linux.org.tw/~jserv/archives/001392.html  GParts - GTK+/GNOME 與 Qt/KDE 應用程式的整合

FlawZero

OSNEWS上这个评论好
=========================
Let me cover everything.

FROM KDE:
1) Gnome developers hate everyone, including children (especially the cute ones)
2) Gnome has bonobo, and bonobo is evil! Evil!
3) Gnome is written in C. KDE is cool because it is C++ and the documentation is so cool.
4) Gnomes applications all suck, except the ones that are better than KDE's

FROM GNOME:
1) KDE hasn't met a feature it doesn't like to add, feature sluts!
2) KDE has proprietary licensing issues, paying for a proprietary license is lame.
3) KDE lacks to language freedom that Gnome has, C++ is so 1980's!
4) KDE applications all suck, except the ones that are better than Gnomes.'

For all of those about to comment why KDE is cooler, or vise-versa then please take this in mind:

WE DON'T CARE! WE CHOOSE THE DESKTOP THAT BEST MEETS OUR NEEDS! YOUR COMMENT WON'T CHANGE THAT.

That goes for this article too.