LinuxSir.cn,穿越时空的Linuxsir!

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: shell linux mysql
查看: 816|回复: 7

quanta编译了一个多小时,一用不过尔尔!

[复制链接]
发表于 2004-11-27 20:46:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
看不出庞大的quanta写起网页来比vi强在何处!?

linux下难道就没有好一点的网页编辑器?
发表于 2004-11-27 21:14:05 | 显示全部楼层
I am quite dull in web page design.  I use Mozilla Composer and now switch to OpenOffice.org WebWriter.  According to the current issue (LXF59) of Linux Format magazine, the editor suggest:

"ages begun in Mozilla are edited later in OO.o and then finally cleaned up in Bluefish or Quanta (or vice versa).  It's not the most efficient way of working, but it does work."

In other words, there is no single web editor that can do everything the best at this moment.
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-27 21:20:13 | 显示全部楼层
说实话,我也在用mozilla的编辑器,只是总觉得不如dreamweaver.
发表于 2004-11-27 21:39:40 | 显示全部楼层
Mozilla Composer is rather rustic and Dreamweaver is almost state-of-the-art.  People only complain Dreamweaver generates too many rubbish codes and need to be cleaned up with text editor later.
发表于 2004-11-28 20:16:49 | 显示全部楼层
dreamweaver的代码还有问题?说FP还行,DW的代码和自己写的差别不大吧。
发表于 2004-11-28 20:34:31 | 显示全部楼层
还是自己一句句写代码比较放心。
发表于 2004-11-28 22:17:20 | 显示全部楼层

回复: quanta编译了一个多小时,一用不过尔尔!

最初由 Dragonsoar 发表
看不出庞大的quanta写起网页来比vi强在何处!?

linux下难道就没有好一点的网页编辑器?

quanta有一个BE Edition,正在做所见即所得的功能,但比起mozilla差的还是很远
发表于 2004-11-28 22:22:30 | 显示全部楼层
极为专业的有 IBM WebSphere Studio for Linux
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表